Skip to the good stuff!

Posts

ISO: Type Identification

Via the contact form:

I am just starting to support the usage of an 1873 Peerless letter press for the local Jackson Ella Sharp Museum. First item to be address is that previous operators failed to file the print type after use. My question is: Where can I locate a table relating the “nick” in the type body to its intended font? I have searched on the ‘net for three days w/ no luck. Thanks for your help. Paul Mc

Comment

Comments

  1. Paul Moxon, Website Editor 17 October, 2015 at 7:00 pm

    Returning printing type to the proper compartments within the type case is called distribution. Generically, individual characters are called sorts. They’re returned to the proper compartments with the aid of a lay of the case schematic.

    The nick can identify the type foundry, but not the typeface. Typefaces are best designed by pulling a proof, then comparing to a specimen. One great resource for this is American metal typefaces of the Twentieth Century by Mac McGrew.

    See these article on Identifying Metal Type:
    http://www.circuitousroot.com/artifice/letters/press/noncomptype/identifying-metal-type/nicks/index.html
    http://www.circuitousroot.com/artifice/letters/press/noncomptype/identifying-metal-type/pinmarks/index.html

  2. The first step in identifying type is to look for a pinmark. If there is one (mostly on older types) it will identify the foundry that made the type, and looking into that foundry’s type specimen books will take you to the name of the typeface. If there is no pinmark, or just a circular indentation with no text, chances are that the type was made by ATF.

  3. Thank you for the very helpful comments. I really appreciate all the comments/help I can receive.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

APHA encourages comments to be short and to the point; as a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.